S23 Landing Banner

EL01.07.02

Efficiency Enhancement of Bifacial Sb2Se3 Photovoltaic Devices with Cu2O Back Buffer: A Modeling Study

When and Where

May 7, 2024
8:15am - 8:30am

EL01-virtual

Presenter

Co-Author(s)

Sanghyun Lee1

University of Kentucky1

Abstract

Sanghyun Lee1

University of Kentucky1
Thin-film solar cells based on an Antimony Selenide (Sb<sub>2</sub>Se<sub>3</sub>) absorber layer have been emerging as third-generation photovoltaic devices with promising properties. A Sb<sub>2</sub>Se<sub>3</sub> absorber has 1.1 eV bandgap, a high absorption coefficient at visible light (&gt;10<sup>5</sup> cm<sup>−1</sup>), good carrier mobility (&lt;15 cm<sup>2</sup>/Vs), long carrier lifetime (&lt;67 ns), and simple binary compound with high vapor pressure and low melting point (550 °C).<br/>Due to the versatility of Sb<sub>2</sub>Se<sub>3</sub> thin-films, Sb<sub>2</sub>Se<sub>3</sub> has been studied by varying compositions and concentrations of incorporated elements for various applications. In particular, Ge-incorporated Sb<sub>2</sub>Se<sub>3</sub> thin-films (hereafter, Ge- Sb<sub>2</sub>Se<sub>3</sub>) have been reported as a good polycrystalline absorber candidate with Ge concentration &lt;15 %.<br/>To further improve the efficiency of polycrystalline Sb<sub>2</sub>Se<sub>3</sub> devices, both front and rear-side illumination could be captured by utilizing the bifacial device configuration of Sb<sub>2</sub>Se<sub>3</sub> devices. However, developing bifacial devices has stagnated in thin-film photovoltaic technologies due to the short carrier lifetime (&lt;100 nS) as compared to polysilicon counterparts. For instance, the record efficiency of rear-side illumination is reported as 9.2 % for CIGS, 8.0 % for CdTe, and 9.0 % for Kesterite solar cells, respectively. Designing a bifacial photovoltaic structure has been studied by several research groups and recently, a few studies of thin-film devices with a thin absorber (&lt;2 um) such as CIGS, CdTe, and Kesterite have been reported. By carefully selecting a transparent back buffer layer coupled with a transparent conducting back contact, a bifacial device configuration needs to be optimized in thickness and doping concentration to maximize a bifaciality factor, which is the ratio of rear-to-front efficiency to the same irradiation.<br/>In this contribution, we have theoretically studied bifacial Ge Sb<sub>2</sub>Se<sub>3</sub> devices after fabricating Ge Sb<sub>2</sub>Se<sub>3</sub>absorber thin-films, followed by characterizing the optical properties. The optical properties of a Ge- Sb<sub>2</sub>Se<sub>3</sub> absorber layer were used as input parameters for modeling and numerical simulation of the bifacial device configuration. For our analytical simulation, we have used in-house MATLAB modeling suites that have been developed in our group. We have proposed new bifacial devices to improve the overall device performance and optimized developed device models with various parameters. With a Cu<sub>2</sub>O back buffer layer, the best efficiency of front-side illumination is 19.7 %, Voc (744.4 mV), Jsc (40.14 mA/cm2), and FF (66.1 %). For the rear-side illumination, the performance is 13.0 %, Voc (724.5 mV), Jsc (31.6 mA/cm2), and FF (56.7 %). Consequently, the bifaciality factor is 66 %.

Keywords

thin film

Symposium Organizers

Silvia Armini, IMEC
Santanu Bag, AsterTech
Mandakini Kanungo, Corning Incorporated
Gilad Zorn, General Electric Aerospace

Publishing Alliance

MRS publishes with Springer Nature

Symposium Support